The user is sending repeated heartbeat checks. According to HEARTBEAT.md, I should:
1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

The scraper timestamp hasn't changed - it's still 2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z. I've been checking this same timestamp repeatedly. No new scrapes have run, so there are no status changes to report.

According to the rules in HEARTBEAT.md:
- Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day
- If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK

Since the scraper timestamp is unchanged, nothing has changed since the last check.


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.


The user is sending me the same heartbeat message again. Following HEARTBEAT.md:

1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

I need to check if the scraper has run again and if there are any changes. Let me check the scrape timestamp.

exec

cat /home/crogers2287/accela/apps/permit-tracker/data/all-permits.json | jq -r '.scrapedAt'


Same timestamp as before (18:18:08 UTC). No new scraper run since last check. No changes to report.


The user is sending me another heartbeat check. According to HEARTBEAT.md, I should:

1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

I've been checking the scraper timestamp repeatedly and it hasn't changed from 2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z. This means no new scraper runs have completed since the last check.

Since there are no new scraper results and no status changes, I should reply HEARTBEAT_OK.


Same timestamp as before. No new scraper results. According to HEARTBEAT.md rules: "Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day" and "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK".

Nothing has changed - scraper results are the same.


The user is asking me to check HEARTBEAT.md and follow it strictly. I've already read HEARTBEAT.md from the workspace context at the beginning. Let me review what it says:

```
# HEARTBEAT.md — Carl

## On Every Heartbeat
1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

## Proactive
- After scraper runs (5x daily), compare current vs last-known status
- If a permit moves to "Approved" or "Issued" — celebrate and notify
- If a permit gets new issues — alert immediately

## Rules
- Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day
- If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK
- Quiet hours: 23:00-07:00 EST
```

The key instruction is: "Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK."

I've been checking the scraper timestamp repeatedly - it's been the same (2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z) for all these heartbeats. No status changes.

According to HEARTBEAT.md rules: "Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day" and "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK"

Since the scraped data hasn't changed (same timestamp), I should reply HEARTBEAT_OK.


Same timestamp as all previous checks. No changes detected since last heartbeat. According to HEARTBEAT.md: "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK"


Following HEARTBEAT.md instructions:
1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

The scraper timestamp hasn't changed from 2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z since my first check, which means no new scrapes have run. I should just reply HEARTBEAT_OK since there's nothing new to report and the HEARTBEAT.md says "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK"


The user is sending heartbeat checks. According to HEARTBEAT.md:

1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

I should check the scrape timestamp to see if there's been a new scrape since the last check at 18:18:08.424Z.

Let me check the timestamp again to see if it has changed.


Same timestamp as before (18:18:08.424Z). No new scrape has run. Nothing has changed. I should respond with HEARTBEAT_OK per the instructions.


The user is asking me to check HEARTBEAT.md and follow it strictly. Looking at the project context, HEARTBEAT.md says:

```
# HEARTBEAT.md — Carl

## On Every Heartbeat
1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

## Proactive
- After scraper runs (5x daily), compare current vs last-known status
- If a permit moves to "Approved" or "Issued" — celebrate and notify
- If a permit gets new issues — alert immediately

## Rules
- Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day
- If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK
- Quiet hours: 23:00-07:00 EST
```

I've been checking the scraper timestamp repeatedly and it hasn't changed since 18:18:08.424Z (2026-02-11). The instruction says "Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats." So I should only check if there are NEW changes since the last scrape I saw.

The scrapedAt timestamp is still 2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z - no new scrape has run since my last check. So nothing has changed.

According to HEARTBEAT.md rules: "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK"

So I should reply HEARTBEAT_OK.


Still same scrape time - 18:18:08. No new data since last check. Per HEARTBEAT.md: "If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK"


The user is asking me to follow HEARTBEAT.md strictly. Let me check the scraped timestamp to see if there's been a new scrape since last check.

The timestamp is still 2026-02-11T18:18:08.424Z - same as all previous checks. No change.

According to HEARTBEAT.md:
1. Check permit scraper results — any status changes since last check?
2. Flag permits with NEW issues, NOC missing, or status changes to Chad
3. Update memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md with any changes found
4. Check if any permits are stuck in "Awaiting Client Reply" — remind Chad

Rules:
- Don't repeat alerts for the same permit issue in the same day
- If nothing changed since last check, reply HEARTBEAT_OK
- Quiet hours: 23:00-07:00 EST

The scraper hasn't run since 18:18:08 UTC (that's 1:18 PM EST). No new scrape results, no status changes. I should reply HEARTBEAT_OK.


No change in scraper results since last check. Same timestamp. Nothing to report.


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UEyJg35cq81U75oH52"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UFM1eC3Gd2qX5uRzBb"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UFzpjk2wK3WAgbXQuB"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UGo1MhMQjrdhZ1ydca"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UH1NW4zyqjCd8USgNm"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UHN1EKR5Y5kc3ASwws"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UHtAwctCLxvXBUySFR"}


429 {"type":"error","error":{"type":"rate_limit_error","message":"This request would exceed your account's rate limit. Please try again later."},"request_id":"req_011CY3UJhWGX5MQYwcVMwAas"}