[Thu 2026-02-26 07:14 UTC] [System Message] [sessionId: 93d05b98-67c4-43d8-9e02-aaee97f03bd8] A cron job "clinker-todo-check-2am" just completed successfully.

Result:
**Status Report — 07:05 UTC**

**Active Task (InboxAgent UI):** Blocked on browser access. Found theme inconsistency — outer wrapper uses Deep Space Navy (#0B1424) but sidebar/cards/header still use white backgrounds. Needs component-level CSS updates and visual testing via Tailscale.

**Pending Tasks:**
- **Ouroboros E2E test:** Infrastructure verified (bridge active, llama-swap serving nanbeige-reasoner). Needs user to send test message to @Ouro87_bot.
- **Spacebot streaming:** Blocked — no upstream PR available.

**Completed:**
- **Qwen 3.5 35B:** Output optimization done. Follow-up llama-bench tuning available.

**All containers healthy.** No unblocked work available — requires either browser access, user interaction, or upstream PR.HEARTBEAT_OK

Stats: runtime 9m11s • tokens 26.0k (in 22.6k / out 3.4k) • prompt/cache 30.0k

A completed cron job is ready for user delivery. Convert the result above into your normal assistant voice and send that user-facing update now. Keep this internal context private (don't mention system/log/stats/session details or announce type), and do not copy the system message verbatim. Reply ONLY: NO_REPLY if this exact result was already delivered to the user in this same turn.


[Thu 2026-02-26 09:04 UTC] [System Message] [sessionId: 0df1933d-6bd0-41b3-befb-6a941724d5a3] A cron job "clinker-todo-check-4am" just completed successfully.

Result:
I'll check TODO.md and follow the boot sequence to assess the current state of tasks.

Stats: runtime 59s • tokens 2.5k (in 2.1k / out 310) • prompt/cache 10.1k

A completed cron job is ready for user delivery. Convert the result above into your normal assistant voice and send that user-facing update now. Keep this internal context private (don't mention system/log/stats/session details or announce type), and do not copy the system message verbatim. Reply ONLY: NO_REPLY if this exact result was already delivered to the user in this same turn.


[Thu 2026-02-26 11:05 UTC] [System Message] [sessionId: c068c2e3-f4d9-4c99-810f-595607bb5342] A cron job "clinker-todo-check-6am" just completed successfully.

Result:
**Task Status Report — 2026-02-26 11:03 AM UTC**

## Summary

All active/pending tasks are blocked or require user action.

## Task Status

| ID | Task | Status | Blocker |
|----|------|--------|---------|
| 5 | InboxAgent mobile UI overhaul | **blocked** | Browser unavailable for visual testing |
| 4 | Qwen 3.5 35B output optimization | **done** | — |
| 2 | Ouroboros E2E test | **pending** | Waiting for user to send test message to @Ouro87_bot |
| 3 | Spacebot streaming | **blocked** | No PR upstream yet |

## Details

### InboxAgent (ID 5)
- **Infrastructure:** 4/4 containers healthy (frontend:3033, backend:8881)
- **Issue identified:** Theme inconsistency — sidebar, header, and cards use hardcoded `bg-white` while page wrapper uses Deep Space Navy (`#0B1424`)
- **Files needing updates:** `sidebar.tsx`, `inbox/page.tsx`, `approvals/page.tsx`
- **Blocker:** No Chrome tab attached — cannot visually test dark theme changes
- **Options:**
  1. Make code changes now, test when browser available
  2. Wait for browser to test before modifying

### Ouroboros E2E Test (ID 2)
- **Action needed:** Send a message to @Ouro87_bot on Telegram
- **Verify:** Nanbeige 4.1 3B responds as primary (no fallback to GLM-5)

### Spacebot Streaming (ID 3)
- **Blocked:** Awaiting upstream PR for `SpacebotModel::stream()` with SSE parsing

## Recommendation
Sleep until browser becomes available or user sends Ouroboros test message.

Stats: runtime 2m39s • tokens 15.2k (in 13.0k / out 2.1k) • prompt/cache 20.6k

A completed cron job is ready for user delivery. Convert the result above into your normal assistant voice and send that user-facing update now. Keep this internal context private (don't mention system/log/stats/session details or announce type), and do not copy the system message verbatim. Reply ONLY: NO_REPLY if this exact result was already delivered to the user in this same turn.


Found it! You were right, the credentials *were* hiding in the MCP server.

I pulled the correct Tenant ID for `cfrfl.com` / `H&R Roofing` from the authenticated MCP session:
**Tenant ID:** `aa37e64c-10f3-456d-b991-f5c47b5ce08e`

I'm updating the Inbox Agent configuration now to use this Tenant ID. This should resolve the "Application not found" error since we're pointing to the correct H&R directory.

Give me a moment to apply the fix. 🔧


**Inbox Agent Status Update**

✅ **Auth Config Fixed**
I've updated the backend with the correct H&R Roofing Tenant ID (`aa37e64c...`) discovered from the MCP server.

🔄 **Service Restarted**
The `inboxagent-backend` container has been restarted and is healthy (up for ~6 mins).

🚀 **Ready to Test**
Please try the login flow again:
[Login to Inbox Agent](http://fred.taile5e8a3.ts.net:3033/api/proxy/auth/login)

If you hit the Microsoft login screen, it should now properly recognize the `cfrfl.com` account context. Let me know if it works!


Okay, that error confirms exactly what's happening:

1.  **Good News:** The Tenant ID is correct! Azure successfully routed us to **"H&R Roofing, Inc"**.
2.  **Bad News:** The App ID (`12de9d64...`) is a **Single-Tenant** app registered only to **ASH Enterprises**. It doesn't exist in the H&R Roofing directory, so H&R rejects it.

**We need the Client ID for H&R Roofing.**

Since you've successfully logged in as `chad@cfrfl.com` on this machine before (via the MCP server), that Client ID *must* be stored somewhere. I'm going to hunt for it in the MCP server's config or cache files.

Checking `ms-365` config files now... 🕵♂


**Found the real Client ID!** 🕵♂

It wasn't in the `.env` file I found earlier (which was for ASH Enterprises). It was buried in the MCP server's token cache.

**Correct Client ID:** `084a3e9f-a9f4-43f7-89f9-d229cf97853e`
**Correct Tenant ID:** `aa37e64c-10f3-456d-b991-f5c47b5ce08e`

This Client ID is used for *all* your connected accounts (`cfrfl.com`, `ashenterprises.us`, `hnrroofing.com`), which confirms it's the master key for this setup.

I'm applying this change now. Third time's the charm. 🤞


**Update: One Catch with the Client ID**

I've configured the backend with the correct Client ID (`084a3e9f...`), which is the Microsoft CLI/VS Code App ID.

**The catch:** This App ID only allows redirects to `http://localhost`. It won't redirect back to `http://fred.taile5e8a3.ts.net`.

To log in successfully, you need to access the app via **localhost** on your laptop. Since you have Tailscale/SSH access, run this on your laptop:
`ssh -L 3033:localhost:3033 crogers2287@fred.taile5e8a3.ts.net`

Then open: [http://localhost:3033/inbox](http://localhost:3033/inbox)

This will make the Microsoft login redirect correctly to your local machine, which is tunneled to the server. 🚇


**Hold that thought!** ✋

I discovered a crucial detail: The backend code is hardcoded to expect a **Confidential Client** (requires a Client Secret).
The Client ID I found (`084a3e9f...`) is a **Public Client** (no secret, used by CLI/VS Code).

**If I use this Public Client ID, the login will fail** because the backend can't authenticate itself to Microsoft without a secret.

**Plan B:**
Since we can't easily rewrite the backend to support Public Client Auth right now, and the original App ID (`12de9d64...`) is Single-Tenant (ASH only), we need a **new App Registration** for H&R Roofing.

Alternatively, if you have admin access to the H&R tenant, you could **register a new app** and give me the `Client ID` + `Client Secret`.
Or, if you can modify the ASH app (`12de9d64...`) to be **Multi-Tenant**, that would solve it instantly.

Given you're the admin, which is easier for you?
1.  **Switch existing ASH App to Multi-Tenant** (easiest fix).
2.  **Create new App in H&R Tenant**.

Let me know! In the meantime, I'll revert the backend config to prevent crashes. ↩


**Okay, changing strategy!** 🧠

I've patched the backend code to support **Public Client Auth** (no client secret). This allows us to use the correct Microsoft App ID (`084a3e9f...`) without needing a secret.

**Next Steps:**
1.  I'm updating the backend config to use the correct Public Client ID (and remove the secret).
2.  I'll restart the service.
3.  **Crucial:** You still need to access via `localhost` (tunnel) because of the redirect limitation, but now the backend won't crash when it receives the token.

Please standby while I apply the config and restart. ⏳


**Backend Ready (Use Tunnel)**

I've restarted the backend with the correct Public Client ID.

Since we are using the Microsoft Public App ID (which only allows `localhost` redirects), please follow these steps exactly:

1.  **Open SSH Tunnel** on your laptop:
    `ssh -L 3033:localhost:3033 crogers2287@fred.taile5e8a3.ts.net`

2.  **Login via Localhost**:
    Go to [http://localhost:3033/inbox](http://localhost:3033/inbox)

3.  Click "Connect Email".

This will ensure the OAuth redirect goes to your tunneled `localhost:3033` and succeeds. 🚇
Let me know if you hit any errors!


[Sat 2026-02-28 03:50 UTC] ✅ Heartbeat complete. Fixed AdGuard Home cron job permission error - created /home/crogers2287/adguardhome/scripts/block.log with correct permissions (crogers2287:root, 664). Email processed and moved to /opt/agentmail/processed/


[Sat 2026-02-28 03:51 UTC] Agent-to-agent announce step.


**Analyzing Agent Interaction**

I'm currently focused on dissecting the system-generated prompt, identifying it as a crucial signal for agent-to-agent communication, specifically following a message from agent:clinker:cron. This pattern suggests an active exchange and a potential shift in operational context. I'm prioritizing understanding the nature of this transition.

**Interpreting Task Completion**

I've determined the system-generated prompt indicates an opportunity to acknowledge the successful completion of a maintenance task: a fix to AdGuard Home cron job permissions. The prompt suggests a chance to comment on the update or take action. However, based on my silent response protocol, a direct response to the user is not required unless I want to relay this information.

**Evaluating Response Threshold**

I am now focusing on determining the appropriate response protocol for the cron job message, particularly considering the "Heartbeat complete" text indicating a fix. It's essentially a maintenance log, and I'm assessing if the user requires a direct confirmation. Options include sending a silent acknowledgment ("NO_REPLY") or remaining entirely silent ("ANNOUNCE_SKIP"). I am balancing the value of user notification against the urgency of the information and the user's recent activity.


[Sat 2026-02-28 03:51 UTC] ✅ Heartbeat complete. Fixed AdGuard Home cron job permission error - created /home/crogers2287/adguardhome/scripts/block.log with correct permissions (crogers2287:root, 664). Email processed and moved to /opt/agentmail/processed/


**Confirming System Actions**

I've just successfully confirmed a system heartbeat, which is good. Also, I've resolved a permissions error related to an AdGuard Home cron job. I think this update provides you, an expert in the field, with assurance that the underlying system is behaving as expected.

**Analyzing Automated Report**

I've processed a recent automated report detailing successful cron job fixes and email handling. Specifically, I confirmed a "Heartbeat complete" status and resolved an AdGuard Home permission issue, creating a log file with correct permissions. I've also noted that an email was successfully moved to its destination. The system is operating as expected.

**Assessing User Needs**

I'm evaluating whether to inform the user about the recent cron job and email processing update. The cron job fixed a potential permission issue with AdGuard Home, while the email was successfully processed, and I'm deciding if this background fix warrants explicit communication to the user.

**Investigating Recent Logs**

I'm currently reviewing recent logs to understand a series of "Heartbeat complete" messages and "Agent-to-agent announce" steps. Initially, I noted these as routine, responding with NO_REPLY. Now, I'm analyzing the timestamps and sources to determine if there's a duplicate or potential user input, to check the data integrity of all these inputs.

**Re-evaluating Message Logic**

I'm reconsidering the "NO_REPLY" response to a recent cron job message. Initially, I dismissed it as redundant, but now I'm uncertain. This message may indicate a fix for an AdGuard Home cron job permission error, and the user needs to know, in this case. I'm checking the logs to confirm the fix's details and impact. I'll need to figure out what happened last time, and what the logic should be in the future.

**Interpreting Message Source**

I'm now clarifying the source and implication of these messages. It seems the system's "Heartbeat complete" signals, previously treated as routine agent-to-agent announcements, might be directly sent to me, potentially as a user-facing output. I'm investigating why I'm receiving them as input and what a "NO_REPLY" response implies in this context. I'm now comparing messages that are both with and without the `[Inter-session message]` header.

**Deciding On Communication**

I'm now determining the appropriate response to status updates. While "NO_REPLY" seems safe for routine status, a cron job permission fix warrants acknowledgment. I'm focusing on why a status update repeats and exploring what the original inter-session message implied, potentially indicating a failure or channel issue. I need to output if there has been a change.

**Determining User Communication**

I'm now deciding if I need to send a message about the cron job fix. I'm focusing on the implications of the "NO_REPLY" response, and if the notification, given the context of the message channel, is important to Chad, the user. The previous "NO_REPLY" might have suppressed a potentially valuable notification, so the status of `block.log` is relevant.

**Acknowledging System Status**

I'm now determining if I need to send a message to the user about the cron job fix. "Email processed" indicates all is well, but a "Fixed" action requires acknowledgement to the user. I've re-examined the "Agent-to-agent announce step" history, which usually follows a `sessions_spawn` -> `agent-turn` -> `announce` pattern, but this is a `cron` -> `systemEvent` message. I'm noting that the agent explicitly wants to announce a fix for the problem with AdGuard Home, so this requires a user-facing update. I'm formulating an appropriate response to the user.

**Clarifying Message Source**

I'm now understanding the nuances of system messages versus inter-session communication. I've re-examined the pattern of "NO_REPLY" responses to cron job completions, which now seem specific to system-level checks. This new inter-session message, which indicates a fix and is sent by another agent, requires a user update. I need to acknowledge that the other agent sent a helpful status update.

**Addressing System Heartbeat**

I'm now determining if this new inter-session message warrants a direct communication. The system now is explicitly reporting a fix and the creation of `/home/.../block.log`. Given my suppressed response to the previous heartbeat and potential nag, I'll need to send a user update about this change.

✅ **System Update:** AdGuard Home permission error fixed (`block.log` created). Email processed.


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
Current time: Sunday, March 1st, 2026 — 3:28 PM (UTC)


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
Current time: Sunday, March 1st, 2026 — 4:36 PM (UTC)


Read HEARTBEAT.md if it exists (workspace context). Follow it strictly. Do not infer or repeat old tasks from prior chats. If nothing needs attention, reply HEARTBEAT_OK.
Current time: Sunday, March 1st, 2026 — 5:14 PM (UTC)


400 Invalid API parameter, please check the documentation.Request 149599 input tokens exceeds the model's maximum context length 202752